|
System
Label
2 . Background
2.1 Company Infomation
Roscommon based System Label (www.systemlabel.com/start.html)
is a specialist printer of industrial labels for multinational
manufacturers in the electronics, automotive and medical
sectors. A wholly owned subsidiary of German company
Bischoff GmbH, System Label has been in Ireland since
1992 and has grown to a staff of 45.
Although a seemingly insignificant product (i.e. the
label underneath a keyboard), the systems required
to produce it needed to be as rigorous as for those
companies producing circuit boards, batteries, processors
for that same PC. Often, the label would carry health
warnings, safety warnings or simply general information
about a specific product.
The business for System Label in Ireland was generated
from two sources. A large proportion of business was
related to clients of the parent company in Germany
- Daimler Chrysler, Siemens, and Bosch to name a few.
These orders were processed through the German plant
but production happened in Roscommon. The balance
was generated through sales and marketing activity
originating in Ireland. Primarily, these clients would
be large indigenous multinationals and manufacturers
of electrical and medical equipment based in Ireland
and the UK.
System Label had been building up its internal IT
system for a number of years prior to the implementation
of the two new modules raw materials management
and Data Integration the focus of this case.
Development of the system in Ireland started in 1992
and, from a simple manual list, grew to an Excel spreadsheet
and finally to a Microsoft Access database, the platform
on which todays system is built. By 1999, various
modules had been added allowing the system to handle:
- Orders
- Stock
Control of raw materials (in each plant)
- Delivery
notes
- Invoicing
- Stock
control of Finished goods
- Quotations
In 1999 a
decision was made that the system developed in Roscommon should be introduced
to the plant in Germany. Both plants ran the systems in parallel and data
transfer was handled manually with information being faxed between the
sites on a weekly basis.
2.2
Market Information
System Labels main customers were large-scale manufacturers of durable
consumer and industrial goods. In Ireland, the company dealt with around
100-200 clients on an ongoing basis. When combined with the German plant,
the total number of customers rose to around 400-500. Although the number
of clients wasnt particularly high, the number of products per client
could run into many thousands:
- The same
label may be produced in small numbers for multiple countries with different
text.
- When dealing
with safety labels and name plates, the number of variations could be
huge.
Although
it may seem strange a significant portion of the Roscommon plants
business was generated from its German parent, there were a number of
very good reasons for this:
- Security
of supply Clients in Germany liked to have the security of knowing
that their product could be produced in one of two plants and that both
could supply exactly the same part.
- Efficiency
With two plants there was a potential issue with capacity balance.
The production process within System Label was mass job shop
production but with very small runs. This made it increasingly hard
to realise a high level of capacity utilisation the two plants
were always running at 60-70%
capacity. By sharing work between the two plants, a much higher utilisation
could be achieved.
- Cost Effectiveness
The lower cost of production meant that it was often cheaper
to produce in Ireland. A readily available pool of labour, easier expansion
capabilities (in case of equipment and premises etc.) and lower rent
costs also offered significant cost reductions.
The Roscommon
plant could produce a part for an Irish customer in a matter of hours
where previously, this may have taken 2-3 days if it was produced in Germany
and couriered to the client. Through relationships with multinational
companies in Ireland, System Labels business had started to extend
into
other parts of the world including the United States and Eastern Europe.
Although the benefits of having plants in Ireland and Germany (in addition
to them both running the same s system) were clear, there was scope for
technology to introduce even greater benefits.
|